Anyway, I’d like to think my articles are pretty even-handed, whether through my own lack of expert knowledge on the subject, my own sense of fair-play, or because of journalistic ethics. (Hey, who’s that laughing at the back?). Certainly not knocking pieces for the airport/economy anyway.

So after chatting to Friends of the Earth about BIA’s record on promoting employment and economic growth, I phoned up the airport for a response. They promised me one and left. A few minutes later I got a call back.

“Hello, we’re putting together a response to your request. We notice you did that piece in the paper this morning as well [the piece linked above]. We thought it might be helpful for you to come down to the airport one day, meet the guys, have a bit of lunch, and see how everything works. What do you think?”

What do I think? Have I rattled someone’s cage? Could Scotney be in line for a bop on the head and a hasty internment in the concrete under the runway extension? Or more likely being stuffed with free tea and biscuits til he plays nice (this may work). Watch this space.

Models for the Ultimo range include Girl Aloud Sarah Harding and former Hollyoaks actor, I’m a Celebrity star and WAG Gemma Atkinson. I was sent the following five images. Guess which one the Birmingham Post used?

My choice was overruled by the deputy editor Oh well, never mind, what’s the internet for if not pictures of ladies sans vetements?

NB: Title chosen in shameless bid to get web traffic.

All pictures by Ultimo

The other day I wrote a story about city living estate agents Stirling Ackroyd closing their Birmingham office, saying there wasn’t enough going on in the market to make it worth it.

As a city centre dweller and nominal business journalist this made me prick my ears up – especially with everything that’s been said about the credit crunch and the effects on the property market.

And frankly I’ve always wondered why we’re seeing more and more blocks of apartments being thrown up in Birmingham – the Orion building developments and the ones in Digbeth for a start – when things are supposed to be getting so tight. Any explanations?

Unsurprisingly, other estate agents I spoke to said there was nothing to worry about with the market in Birmingham. In fact they said there were still huge opportunities in the buy-to-let sector – good news for them at least I suppose if there’s plenty still going on.

They claimed this was down to the increased number of relatively wealthy people who would normally buy but were now leery of getting into it, and deciding to rent instead. But I can’t say I was completely convinced.

I mean I think it says something about the state of the housing market that a hack like myself, not exactly penniless, but hardly raking it in, can afford to live in the same apartment block as the Regional Managing Director of the company I work for (see here if I haven’t bored you with this anecdote before).

And our own landlord said he was thinking of selling because he wasn’t making enough from the flat on rent. If there are so many wealthy people looking to rent, why are the prices so low?

Is the pace of growth of city living sustainable, as the estate agents say? I suppose we’ll find out in the next year or so…

PS hat-tip to Praguetory for the tip-off for this story. Credity where it’s due.

My favourite piece by him was the novella The City and the Stars, possibly the most atmospheric bit of sci-fi I’ve ever read, dripping with alienation, isolation, desperation, and finally hope.

And of course the short story that inspired this:

(With a little help from Stanley Kubrick). And in another collaboration with another underrated genius (in my opinion at least) The Songs of Distant Earth – turned into a cod-new age tranquil hippy chillout whalesong cheesefest of an album by Mike Oldfield, an album that regardless somehow manages to be one of my favourite.

Last of the big three sci-fi writers. We shan’t see his like again. I’m off to take loads of drugs and watch the starchild bit of 2001 again in memory of Arthur (or at least that’s my excuse).

But there’s one thing that particularly caught my attention. I went along today without any particular agenda. I’m not an entrepreneurial journalist, and doubt I’ll become one one any time soon. But as a dedicated reporter who loves the business of reporting, I wanted to learn about the future of reporting from people much cleverer than myself.

And something really stuck out. The idea of a reporter as a brand, and of creating a community around oneself as a reporter. This isn’t original thinking by any means, I’m sure, but certainly struck home with me. Particularly with the idea of the news gathering process being transparent to improve readers’ access to; and views of; the journalists they read.

Well it was both terrifying, in that it involved me thinking quite how much things are changing, and also slightly reassuring. I’d like to think I was open with the way I do my job, with blog posts like this and this about the way I go about my business and the things I do. I’d also like to think I was approachable as a reporter, and please let me know if I’m not!

Finally, after I stumbled back to my flat I was presented with this post by Steve Dyson, the editor of the Birmingham Mail. What a fantastic example of making the journalistic process available to readers. I’d like to think that any internet reader now has a good idea how the Mail works, and hopefully a warm glow and feeling of ownership of their paper…

Anyway, more tomorrow, I hope. If there’s anyone reading this from JEECamp, was great to meet you!

The wiki set up for the event describes it as:

“an opportunity for a range of people to get together to talk about how on earth journalists and publishers can make a living from journalism in the era of free information, what the challenges are, and what we’ve learned so far.

“It is also an opportunity for people with different skills and experiences to network, share those experiences, and perhaps suggest partnerships or new projects.”

Keynote speaker is Rick Waghorn, founder of the MyFootballWriter website.

Despite having the technical title of Enterprise Editor at the Birmingham Post, I’m not a particularly enterprising person, happy to be a cog in the machine. So I’m not going to have a lot to bring to the table, but it’s going to be fascinating hopefully meeting some people with the skills and drive o make it – enterprise is the future in erms of Journalism seems to be the line.

I’m not going to be doing any video blogging or anything clever like that (see earlier post), but will hopefully be twittering, and for anyone interested, there’s video coverage going to be put up here.

Anyway, now I’ve written this I’m running late! Later everyone.

• Corporate law and how the DTI disqualifies company directors
• Legal aid and how solicitors qualify for it, claim and earn it
• How to get papers from a civil court case in the Queen’s Bench Division
• Insurance against the possibility of legal action

If anyone can recommend any easy books or internet resources I would be very grateful for their help – god know I need it!

Nowadays it seems like every traditional news organisation is trying to get involved as quickly as possible with the new wave of multi-media production, which for many seems to mean video or audio broadcasting as well as text. Am I the only one that not only doesn’t care for the majority of multimedia journalism, but is actually turned off by it?

I’ve been following Stef Lewandowski’s coverage of the SXSW event with interest, and he’s obviously done some great work out there. But to be honest my heart sinks to open up Google Reader and be faced with a bank of audio interviews waiting to be played.

I’m not too far off the ‘youtube generation’ but I can’t be the only one turned off by the increasing use of video and audio in online journalism, not for luddite old-media reasons, but simply for convenience. Is this a matter of convenience that my lifestyle somehow misses out on? Is it just people dazzled by the novelty of new equipment? Am I just an old stick in the mud? (The use of the phrase ‘stick in the mud’ might itself provide the answer to that last one).

This post was semi inspired by Paul Bradshaw’s work on scannability. He talks, very insightfully, about the need to make online writing easily scannable and full of eye-catching numbers, bullet points, lists, etc. But the scannability of text is what makes it much better, in my opinion, than any other medium the vast majority of the time.

I feel genuinely frustrated by the lack of ability to ‘skim read’ a video/audio file, to instantly glance at it, pick out bits and give them as much attention as possible. Frustrated so much that I’ll often avoid a video when I wanted a block of text, even if it’s something I really wanted to know about. And this is not even mentioning the technical problems, of looking at content on an old computer, or in public without headphones, or on my mobile.

This isn’t old-media dinosaurism, it’s quite the opposite. Video and audio dictate to you: want to know what’s going to be said? Sit and wait till the end, then we’ll tell you. Text gives users the power to easily decide whether they want to look at all, some or none of the content in front of them.

None of this is to say that there’s no place for video journalism. But if it’s there, again in my opinion, it has to have something that cannot be provided by text, some proper audio or visual quality, not just a recording of thoughts or conversations for the hell of it. And this doesn’t even need to be (in fact it’s better if it’s not) a particularly high-quality or in-depth recording, as Howard Owens writes here. Certainly not suitable for an interview.

So please editors, don’t get carried away with video or podcasting. It turns me right off and I can’t be the only one!

But here’s something that’s moved me to write, after nearly six months of frustration. A story I’m trying to pin down that is being held back from publication by – who knows, it wouldn’t be fair of me to speculate.

I’m not trying to big myself up here – this isn’t the Thalidomide scandal or sexing up dodgy dossiers, but this is a tale where innocent people at their most vulnerable point have been messed around. And still the news can’t come out properly, not because of secrecy of anything malign, just because the system doesn’t work very well. It’s almost perverse.

Here’s the nub of it. Two directors of the Birmingham Legal Partnership in Small Heath, were punished by the Law Society. The BLP largely deals with issues in Birmingham’s immigrant community. Things like marriage affairs, immigration and the like. So important things to often vulnerable people, often people who might not for example speak English or have anyone else to rely on in this country.

Mr Noor-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi is a Muslim spiritual leader and vice-principal at the successful Hijaz College in Warwickshire – a top Islamic college in Warwickshire. He was suspended from practice for nine months and ordered to pay a share of the costs for his trial.

His co-director, Ms Gursharanjit Virk, was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay the remainder of the costs. These punishments were given out by the Law Society on October 3 last year.

Now why is there a problem? The thing is, due to this country’s stringent – and punitive – libel laws, one has to be very careful what one says in a story.

Now the first thing you probably thought if you read through the little tale above is: what did these guys actually do? And here’s the answer: I know but I’m not going to tell you.

I know exactly what they did, through journalistic methods that I’m not going to go into here. And it’s a matter of public record that they were punished for something.

But unfortunately, the Law Society has still not published its findings from the case – yes the one that finished more than five months ago. And so while I can legally say that these people were punished, I can’t officially say why or what for. Making it useless as a proper news story.

Now they say the wheels of justice grind slow, but this is ridiculous. A very helpful man who deals with information released from the Law Society agrees, but can’t do anything. meanwhile, the BLP continues to operate, Ms Virk continues to work there and Mr Siddiqi gets closer to the end of his practice ban without anyone in the general public being any the wiser about what happened.

The Law Society is an ass. (allegedly, joking, i didn’t mean it, please don’t sue me….)

Hurry up and publish!